By Wikipedia
This page is a summary of published academics' opinions. Please remember that opinions are only allowed in Wikipedia if they are held by writers in reliable sources. While it is possible that an editor is more knowledgeable and correct than any given academic, Wikipedia is not the place for personal opinions.
A map showing the United States as the current superpower, along with other political entities that have broad academic support as potential superpowers.

A potential superpower is a state or a political and economic entity that is speculated to be, or is in the process of becoming, a superpower at some point during the 21st century. Presently, only the United States fulfills the criteria to be considered a superpower.[1]

Predictions about potential superpower have been made in the past, but they have not been perfect.[2][3] States most commonly mentioned as being potential superpowers are China,[4] the European Union,[5] and India.[6] Collectively, these potential superpowers (and the United States) comprise 66.6% of global nominal GDP, 62.2% of global GDP (PPP), more than one third of the total land area and more than 50% of the world's population. A number of observers have also considered Brazil and Russia to be potential superpowers.

Past predictions[edit]

Predictions made in the past have not been perfect. For example, in the 1980s, many political and economic analysts predicted that Japan would eventually accede to superpower status, due to its large population, huge gross domestic product and high economic growth at that time.[2][7] Though still the world's tenth-largest population and third-largest economy as of 2013 in terms of nominal GDP, Japan has faced an ongoing period of weak growth since the Lost Decade of the 1990s, and has been suffering from an aging population since the early 2000s, eroding its potential as a superpower.[3]


See also: Chinese Century
People's Republic of China
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg
People's Republic of China (orthographic projection).svg

The People's Republic of China receives continual coverage in the popular press of its emerging superpower status,[8][9] and has been identified as a rising or emerging economic growth and military superpower by academics and other experts. In fact, the "rise of China" has been named the top news story of the 21st century by the Global Language Monitor, as measured by number of appearances in the global print and electronic media, on the Internet and blogosphere, and in Social Media.[10][11][12][13][14] The term "Second Superpower" has also been applied by scholars to the possibility that the People's Republic of China could emerge as a "second superpower," with global power and influence on par with the United States.[15] The potential for the two countries to form stronger relations to address global issues is sometimes referred to as the Group of Two.

Barry Buzan asserted in 2004 that "China certainly presents the most promising all-round profile" of a potential superpower.[16] Buzan claimed that "China is currently the most fashionable potential superpower and the one whose degree of alienation from the dominant international society makes it the most obvious political challenger." However, he noted this challenge is constrained by the major challenges of development and by the fact that its rise could trigger a counter coalition of states in Asia.

Parag Khanna stated in 2008 that by making massive trade and investment deals with Latin America and Africa, China had established its presence as a superpower along with the European Union and the United States. China's rise is demonstrated by its ballooning share of trade in its gross domestic product. He believed that China's "consultative style" had allowed it to develop political and economic ties with many countries including those viewed as rogue states by the United States. He stated that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization founded with Russia and the Central Asian countries may eventually be the "NATO of the East".[17]

Economist and author of Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China's Economic Dominance Arvind Subramanian argued in 2012 that China will direct the world's financial system by 2020 and that the Chinese renminbi will replace the dollar as the world's reserve currency in 10 to 15 years. The United States' soft power will remain longer. He stated that "China was a top dog economically for thousands of years prior to the Ming Dynasty. In some ways, the past few hundred years have been an aberration."[18]

Lawrence Saez at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, argued in 2011 that the United States will be surpassed by China as military superpower within twenty years. Regarding economic power, the Director of the China Center for Economic Reform at Peking University Yao Yang stated that "Assuming that the Chinese and U.S. economies grow, respectively, by 8% and 3% in real terms, that China's inflation rate is 3.6% and America's is 2% (the averages of the last decade), and that the renminbi appreciates against the dollar by 3% per year (the average of the last six years), China will become the world's largest economy by 2021. By that time, both countries' GDP will be about $24 trillion."[19]

Historian Timothy Garton Ash argued in 2011, pointing to factors such as the International Monetary Fund predicting that China's GDP (purchasing power parity adjusted) will overtake that of the United States in 2016, that a power shift to a world with several superpowers was happening "Now". However, China was still lacking in soft power and power projection abilities and had a low GDP/person. The article also stated that the Pew Research Center in a 2009 survey found that people in 15 out of 22 countries believed that China had or would overtake the US as the world's leading superpower.[20]

In an interview given in 2011, Singapore's first premier, Lee Kuan Yew, stated that while China supplanting the United States is not a foregone conclusion, Chinese leaders are nonetheless serious about displacing the United States as the most powerful country in Asia. "They have transformed a poor society by an economic miracle to become now the second-largest economy in the world. How could they not aspire to be number 1 in Asia, and in time the world?"[21] The Chinese strategy, Lee maintains, will revolve around their "huge and increasingly highly skilled and educated workers to out-sell and out-build all others."[22] Nevertheless, relations with the United States, at least in the medium term, will not take a turn for the worst because China will "avoid any action that will sour up relations with the U.S. To challenge a stronger and technologically superior power like the U.S. will abort their 'peaceful rise.'"[22] Though Lee believes China is genuinely interested in growing within the global framework the United States has created, it is biding its time until it becomes strong enough to successfully redefine the prevailing political and economic order.[23]

Chinese foreign policy adviser Wang Jisi in 2012 stated that many Chinese officials see China as a first-class power which should be treated as such. China is argued to soon become the world's largest economy and to be making rapid progress in many areas. The United States is seen as a declining superpower as indicated by factors such as poor economic recovery, financial disorder, high deficits gaining close to GDP levels and unemployment, increasing political polarization, and over regulation forcing jobs overseas in China.[24][25][26]

Contrary views[edit]

Timothy Beardson, founder of Crosby International Holdings, stated in 2013, that he doesn't see "China becoming a superpower", he writes that China has basically worked as a manufacturing location for the foreign companies as 83% of all high-tech products that are made in China were produced for the foreign companies.[27] He adds that China's problems regarding wages, aging, declining population, and also gender imbalance, (that with the 6:5 ratio of gender, 1 in 6 males will not have a female partner) suggest that such problems will lead to crimes. He also suggested that China continually polluted its environment after 30 years of growth (considering that 20 most polluted cities in the world included 16 cities that are in China).[27][28]

James Fallows writes that too many people in China live without indoor plumbing, and that no mainland science researcher has yet won a Nobel Prize, so it is unlikely able to become an "economic Superpower".[29] He also recalled his mid 1980s visit to China, where he found virtually everyone "poor", and that "rich" people were farmers that had their own family. He further suggests that people usually talk about how life in China is improving, yet if they go to China, they would see that Chinese officials spend too much time thinking about how to deal with the upcoming problems that their country faces.[30]

Geoffrey Murphay's China: The Next Superpower (2008) argued that while the potential for China is high, this is fairly perceived only by looking at the risks and obstacles China faces in managing its population and resources. The political situation in China may become too fragile to survive into superpower status according to Susan Shirk in China: Fragile Superpower (2008). Other factors that could constrain China's ability to become a superpower in the future include limited supplies of energy and raw materials, questions over its innovation capability, inequality and corruption, and risks to social stability and the environment.[31]

Minxin Pei argued in 2010 that China is not a superpower and it will not be one anytime soon and argued that China faces daunting political and economic challenges.[32] In 2012 he argued that China, despite using economic power to influence some nations, has few real friends or allies and is surrounded by potentially hostile nations. This situation could improve if regional territorial disputes would be resolved and China would participate in an effective regional defense system that would reduce the fears of its neighbors. Alternatively, a democratization of China would dramatically improve foreign relations with many nations.[33]

Amy Chua stated in 2007 that whether a country has enough pull to bring immigrants is an important quality for a superpower. She also wrote that China lacks the pull to bring scientists, thinkers, and innovators from other countries as immigrants. However, she believed that China made up for this with its own diaspora, and said that size and resources for them are unparalleled.[34]

European Union[edit]

See also: Eurosphere
European Union
Flag of Europe.svg
Global European Union.svg

The European Union (EU) has been called an emerging superpower by academics.[5][35] Many scholars and academics like T. R. Reid,[36] Andrew Reding,[37] Andrew Moravcsik,[38] Mark Leonard,[39] Jeremy Rifkin,[40] John McCormick,[41] and some politicians like Romano Prodi[42] and Tony Blair,[43] either believe that the EU is, or will become, a superpower in the 21st century.

Mark Leonard cites several factors: the EU's large population, large economy (the EU has the largest economy in the world), low inflation rates, the unpopularity and perceived failure of US foreign policy in recent years, and certain EU member states' high quality of life (especially when measured in terms such as hours worked per week, health care, social services).[44]

John McCormick believes that the EU has already achieved superpower status, based on the size and global reach of its economy and on its global political influence. He argues that the nature of power has changed since the Cold War-driven definition of superpower was developed, and that military power is no longer essential to great power; he argues that control of the means of production is more important than control of the means of destruction, and contrasts the threatening hard power of the United States with the opportunities offered by the soft power wielded by the European Union.[45]

Parag Khanna believes that "Europe is overtaking its rivals to become the world's most successful empire."[46][47] Khanna writes that South America, East Asia, and other regions prefer to emulate the "European Dream" rather than the American variant.[48] This could possibly be seen in the African Union and UNASUR. Notably, the EU as a whole has some of the world's largest and most influential languages being official within its borders.[49]

Andrew Reding also takes the future EU enlargement into account. An eventual future accession of the rest of Europe, the whole of Russia, and Turkey, would not only boost the economy of the EU, but it would also increase the EU's population to about 800 million, which he considers almost equal to that of India or China. The EU is qualitatively different from India and China since it is enormously more prosperous and technologically advanced.[37] Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said in 2005: "In 10 or 15 years, the EU will be a place where civilizations meet. It will be a superpower with the inclusion of Turkey."[50]

Robert J. Guttman wrote in 2001 that the very definition of the term superpower has changed and in the 21st century, it does not only refer to states with military power, but also to groups such as the European Union, with strong market economics, young, highly educated workers savvy in high technology, and a global vision.[51] Friis Arne Petersen, the Danish ambassador to the US, has expressed similar views. He conceded that the EU is a "special kind of superpower," one that has yet to establish a unified military force that exerts itself even close to the same level as many of its individual members.[52]

Additionally, it is argued by commentators that full political integration is not required for the European Union to wield international influence: that its apparent weaknesses constitute its real strengths (as of its low profile diplomacy and the emphasis on the rule of law)[45] and that the EU represents a new and potentially more successful type of international actor than traditional ones;[53] however, it is uncertain if the effectiveness of such an influence would be equal to that of a more politically integrated union of states such as the United States.[54]

Barry Buzan notes that the EU's potential superpower status depends on its "stateness". It is unclear though how much state-like quality is needed for the EU to be described as a superpower. Buzan states that the EU is unlikely to remain a potential superpower for a long time because although it has material wealth, its "political weakness and its erratic and difficult course of internal political development, particularly as regards a common foreign and defence policy" constrains it from being a superpower.[16]

Alexander Stubb, the Finnish Minister for Foreign Affairs, has said that he thinks the EU is both a superpower and not a superpower. While the EU is a superpower in the sense that it is the largest political union, single market and aid donor in the world, it is not a superpower in the defense or foreign policy spheres. Like Barry Buzan, Alexander Stubb thinks that the most major factor constraining the EU's rise to superpower status is its lack of statehood in the international system, other factors are its lack of internal drive to project power worldwide, and continued preference for the sovereign nation-state among some Europeans. To counterbalance these, he urged the EU leaders to approve and ratify the Lisbon Treaty (which they did in 2009), create an EU foreign ministry (EEAS, established in 2010), develop a common EU defense, hold one collective seat at the UN Security Council and G8, and address what he described as the "sour mood" toward the EU prevalent in some European countries today.[55]

Contrary views[edit]

Some do not believe that the EU will achieve superpower status. "The EU is not and never will be a superpower" according to the former UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs David Miliband.[56] Lacking a unified foreign policy and with an inability to project military power worldwide, the EU lacks "the substance of superpowers," who by definition have "first of all military reach [and] possess the capacity to arrive quickly anywhere with troops that can impose their government's will.".[57] EU parliamentarian Ilka Schroeder argues that conflicts such as the Israeli-Palestinian dispute see close EU involvement largely to compensate for European inability to project military power internationally.[58]

The Economist's Robert Lane Greene notes that the lack of a strong European military only exacerbates the lack of unified EU foreign policy and discounts any EU arguments towards superpower status, noting especially that the EU's creation of a global response force rivaling the superpower's (United States of America) is "unthinkable."[59] "The biggest barrier to European superpowerdom is that European elites refuse to bring their postmodern fantasies about the illegitimacy of military 'hard power' into line with the way the rest of the world interprets reality" according to Soren Kern of Strategic Studies Group.[60]

Britain's Michael Howard has warned against the "worry" that many Europeans are pushing for greater EU integration to counterbalance the United States,[61] while Europe's total reliance on soft (non-military) power is in part because of its lack of a "shared identity."[62] While to some the European Union should be a "model power" unafraid of using military force and backing free trade, its military shortcomings argue against superpower status.[63]

American Thinker's Soeren Kern questions if "Europe really destined to become a global superpower?" Kern continues that "A growing body of research says no. Indeed, overwhelming evidence supports the view that contemporary Europe is beset by a mix of problems that is so complex, that apart from dramatic changes in public policy, Europe is headed toward certain decline, not ascendancy."[64]

George Osborne, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, has also pointed out the economic crisis of the European Union. Osborne said "The biggest economic risk facing Europe doesn't come from those who want reform and re-negotiation. It comes from a failure to reform and renegotiate. It is the status quo which condemns the people of Europe to an ongoing economic crisis and continuing decline." Osborne also said that the EU is facing growing competition with global economic powers like China, India and the US, and the European Union should "reform or decline."[65][66][67]


See also: Indian Century
Republic of India
Flag of India.svg
India (orthographic projection).svg

The Republic of India has seen considerable coverage of its potential of becoming a superpower, both in the media and among academics.[68][69] In 2006, Newsweek and the International Herald Tribune joined several academics in discussing India's potential of becoming a superpower.[68][70]

Anil Gupta is almost certain that India will become a superpower in the 21st century. As an example, he states that due to India's functional institutions of democracy and its relatively corruption-free society, it will emerge as a desirable, entrepreneurial and resource and energy-efficient superpower in the near future. He predicts that by 2015 India will overtake China to be the fastest growing economy in the world and emerge as a full-fledged economic superpower by 2025. In addition to that, he states, India has the potential to serve as a leading example of how to combine rapid economic growth with fairness towards and inclusion of those at the bottom rungs of the ladder and of efficient resource utilization, especially in energy.[71]

Robyn Meredith claims that both India and China will be superpowers.[6] Although, she points out that the average income of European and Americans are better off than Chinese and Indians, and hundreds of millions of Chinese as well as Indians live in poverty, however she also suggested that economic growth of these nations has been most important factor in reducing global poverty of last two decades as per the World Bank report.[72] Amy Chua also adds to this, stating that while India's potential for superpower is great, it still faces many problems such as "pervasive rural poverty, entrenched corruption, and high inequality just to name a few". However, she notes that India has made tremendous strides to fix this, stating that some of India's achievements, such as working to dismantle the centuries-old caste system and maintaining the world's largest diverse democracy is historically unprecedented.[34]

Fareed Zakaria also believes that India has a fine chance at becoming a superpower, pointing out that India's young population coupled with the second-largest English-speaking population in the world could give India an advantage over China. He also believes that while other industrial countries will face a youth gap, India will have lots of young people, or in other words, workers, and by 2050, its per capita income will rise by twenty times its current level. According to Zakaria, another strength that India has is that its democratic government has lasted for 60 years, stating that a democracy can provide for long-term stability, that has given India a name.[73]

Founder and President of the Economic Strategy Institute and former counselor to the Secretary of Commerce in the Reagan Administration Clyde V. Prestowitz Jr. has predicted that "It is going to be India's century. India is going to be the biggest economy in the world. It is going to be the biggest superpower of the 21st century."[74]

Contrary views[edit]

Parag Khanna wrote in 2008 that he believes that India is not, nor will it become a superpower for the foreseeable future, lagging decades behind China in both development and strategic appetite.[75] Instead, he believes India will be a key swing state along with Russia.[76] He says that India is "big but not important", has a highly successful professional class, while millions of its citizens still live in poverty. He also writes that it matters that China borders a dozen more countries than India and is not hemmed in by a vast ocean and the world's tallest mountains.[77] However, in a recent article written by Parag Khanna, he says that India, along with China, will grow ever stronger, while other powers, like Europe, muddle along.[78]

Lant Pritchett, reviewing the book In Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India, writes that, while India has had impressive growth and has some world-class institutions, several other indicators are puzzlingly poor. The malnutrition in India and the coverage of immunization programs are at levels similar or worse than in much sub-Saharan African nations. In the Demographic and Health Surveys, India's child malnutrition was the worst of the 42 nations with comparable and recent data.[79] Adult literacy is 61%. In one study, 26% of teachers were absent from work and 1/3 of those showing up did not teach. 40% of health care workers were absent from work. Caste politics in India remains an important force. Pritchett argues that a very large population, a very long statistical "tail" of high quality students, and some very good higher education institutions gives a misleading impression of Indian education. Indian students placed forty-first and thirty-seventh in a study comparing students in the two Indian states Orissa and Rajasthan to the forty-six nations in the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study.[79]

Manjari Chatterjee Miller, assistant professor of international relations at Boston University, argues that India is a "would-be" great power but "resists its own rise".[80] Three factors contribute to this stagnation, she argues. First, New Delhi's foreign policy decisions are highly individualistic.[80] "This autonomy, in turn, means that New Delhi does very little collective thinking about its long-term foreign policy goals, since most of the strategic planning that takes place within the government happens on an individual level."[81] Second, a dearth of think tanks helps insulate Indian foreign policymakers from outside influences.[80] "U.S. foreign policymakers, by contrast, can expect strategic guidance from a broad spectrum of organizations that supplement the long-term planning that happens within the government itself."[82] Third, many of India's political elites believe that the country's inevitable rise is a Western construct that has placed unrealistic expectations on India's economic growth forecasts and its international commitments.[80] By contrast, Miller notes that Chinese political leaders pay very close attention to the international hype surrounding their country's growing stature.[80] Miller concludes that "India's inability to develop top-down, long-term strategies means that it cannot systematically consider the implications of its growing power. So long as this remains the case, the country will not play the role in global affairs that many expect."[83]

Other contenders[edit]


The Federative Republic of Brazil has seen limited discussion among authorities regarding its potential as a superpower. Writing for the The Diplomatic Courier, former British Ambassador to Brazil, Peter Collecott, identifies that Brazil's recognition as a potential superpower largely stems from its own national identity and ambition. Collecott points out that for the past two hundred years Brazil has sought to emerge as a serious global economic and political power, a position "that [Brazil] instinctively feels is her due".[84] However, Collecott also argues that while Brazil has certainly fulfilled some of its aspirations and finally started to gain the international recognition it deserves, it perhaps won't quite emerge as a superpower, instead, its current position as an emerging power will allow Brazil to shape the future with more realistic aspirations.[84]

In his 2014 publication, The BRICs Superpower Challenge: Foreign and Security Policy Analysis, professor Kwang Ho Chun carefully assesses the likelihood of the BRICs countries attaining the status of superpowers.[85] Regarding Brazil, Kwang Ho Chun highlights that the country possesses enormous and almost untouched "strategic" natural resources, including valuable minerals, a tenth of the world's fresh water and the Earth's largest remaining rainforest. Because of this, Kwang Ho Chun feels it is likely that Brazil could gain a dominant role in international relations, especially when it comes to environmental issues.[85] This soft power influence is further enhanced by Brazil's policy makers seeking to engage in as many international organization as possible and forming alliances, most notably on social, diplomatic and economic issues.[85] Despite its economic potential and Brazil's "self-image as a country with a great destiny", Kwang Ho Chun believes that the country "falls far short of the levels required for a superpower".[85] Supporting his belief, he emphasizes Brazil's apparent lack of "traditional hard power" (I.e. military power and global security influence) as a major obstacle. Kwang Ho Chun writes that Brazil has "little incentive to invest in its military" as "the country developed in an environment with hardly any inter-state security threats", therefore Brazil "may never be in a position to accumulate enough influence on global security matters to meet the criteria of being a superpower."[85] Instead, Ho Chun feels that Brazil will emerge as a great power with an important position in some spheres of influence but limited in others such as international security.[85]


The Russian Federation has seen some discussion regarding its potential of re-emerging as a superpower, while others have made the assertion that it is already a superpower. In 2009, Hugo Chavez, late President of Venezuela whose regime was noted to have enjoyed warm relations with the Kremlin, stated that "Russia is a superpower", citing waning American influence in global affairs, and suggested the ruble be elevated to a global currency.[86] Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Russia an important superpower, praising its effectiveness as an ally of Israel and foe of Iran.[87] In his 2005 publication entitled Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower, Steven Rosefielde, a professor of economics at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, predicted that Russia would emerge as a superpower before 2010 and augur another arms race. However, Rosefielde noted that such an end would come with tremendous sacrifice to global security and the Russian people's freedom.[88]

In 2014, Stephen Kinzer of the Boston Globe compared Russia's actions with its own neighboring territories, to those of "any other superpower", taking Ukraine and Crimea as examples.[89] A mixed opinion has been offered by Matthew Fleischer of the Los Angeles Times: he contends that Russia will not become a superpower unless climate change eats away at the permafrost that covers, as of March 2014, two-thirds of the country's landmass. The absence of this permafrost would reveal immense stores of oil, natural gas, and precious minerals, as well as potential farmland, which would allow Russia to "become the world's bread basket -- and control the planet's food supply."[90]

During the annual state of the nation address at the Moscow Kremlin in December 2013, Russian president Vladimir Putin denied any Russian's aspiration to be a superpower. He was quoted saying: "We do not aspire to be called some kind of superpower, understanding that as a claim to world or regional hegemony. We do not infringe on anyone's interests, we do not force our patronage on anyone, or try to teach anyone how to live."[91][92]

Forbes writer Jonathan Adelman has summarized the arguments against Russia's superpower potential thus: "While Russia may have grabbed the headlines for hosting the forthcoming Olympics and Edward Snowden, it's no super power. Russia has a trade profile of a Third World country, a GNP the size of Canada, which is less than 15 percent of the United States GDP, no soft power, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Wall Street or highly rated universities."[93]

Several analysts have commented on the fact that Russia shows signs of an aging and shrinking population. Fred Weir believes that this severely constricts and limits Russia's potential to re-emerge as a central world power.[94] Former political journalist Peter Brown writes, Russia "would like to reclaim the superpower status it held for nearly 40 years after World War II", but in the 21st century "may lack the combination of economic and military power" to do so. He says that "Russia won't be a superpower anytime soon", citing Russia's shrinking population, high levels of poverty and poor public health.[95] British historian and professor Niall Ferguson has also highlighted the negative effects of Russia's declining population, and suggests that Russia is on its way to "global irrelevance".[96] However, Russia showed some modest population growth in 2012 due to immigration.[97]

Nathan Smith of the National Business Review has argued that despite Russia having potential it did not in the 1980s to win another "Cold War", other factors such as American influence in Crimea make superpower status unlikely.[98]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ C. Herring, George (2008). From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. Oxford University Press. p. 1. 
  2. ^ a b Zakaria, Fareed (2008). The Post-American World. W. W. Norton and Company. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-393-06235-9. 
  3. ^ a b Leika Kihara (August 17, 2012). "Japan eyes end to decades long deflation". Reuters. Retrieved September 7, 2012. 
  4. ^ Jacques, Martin (June 15, 2006). "This is the relationship that will define global politics". The Guardian (London). Retrieved May 22, 2010. 
  5. ^ a b Guttman, R.J. (2001). Europe in the New Century. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 
  6. ^ a b Meredith, R. The Elephant and the Dragon: The Rise of India and China and What it Means for All of Us. W.W Norton and Company. ISBN 978-0-393-33193-6. 
  7. ^ "Japan From Superrich To Superpower". Time. July 4, 1988. 
  8. ^ "CNN In-Depth Specials - Visions of China - Asian Superpower". CNN. Retrieved 19 July 2014. 
  9. ^ "China's military presence is growing. Does a superpower collision loom?". The Guardian. 1 January 2014. Retrieved 19 July 2014. 
  10. ^ 2011年5月7日 星期六 (2011-05-07). "The Rise of China Ranked in the First Place of 21st Century News". Ycwb.com. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  11. ^ Romana, Chito (2010-03-02). "Does China Want to Be Top Superpower?". Abcnews.go.com. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  12. ^ "From Rural Transformation to Global Integration The Environmental and Social Impacts of China's Rise to Superpower - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace". Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  13. ^ "China: The Balance Sheet Summary". getabstract. Retrieved 19 July 2014. 
  14. ^ "China As An Economic and Military Superpower: A Dangerous Combination?" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  15. ^ Wood, James (2000). History of International Broadcasting. IET. p. 155. 
  16. ^ a b Buzan, Barry (2004). The United States and the Great Powers. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press. p. 70. ISBN 0-7456-3375-7. 
  17. ^ Khanna, Parag. "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony". The New York Times. Retrieved July 19, 2014. 
  18. ^ Ted Greenwald   (February 28, 2012). "Taming the Dragon: One Scholar's Plan to Soften Chinese Dominance | Magazine". WIRED. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  19. ^ "When Will China Become a Global Superpower?". CNN. June 10, 2011. Archived from the original on March 11, 2012. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  20. ^ "Oxford Prof on China and the New World Order Part 1" (in English, Chinese). Caixin. February 27, 2012. Retrieved July 19, 2014. 
  21. ^ Allison, Graham and Robert D. Blackwill, with Ali Wyne (2012). Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-262-01912-5. 
  22. ^ a b Allison, Graham and Robert D. Blackwill, with Ali Wyne (2012). Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-262-01912-5. 
  23. ^ Allison, Graham and Robert D. Blackwill, with Ali Wyne (2012). Lee Kuan Yew: The Grand Master's Insights on China, the United States, and the World. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-262-01912-5. 
  24. ^ "Counting the jobs lost to China | Economic Policy Institute". epi.org. Retrieved July 8, 2014. 
  25. ^ "US, China Experts Warn of Growing Bilateral Distrust". Voice of America. April 2, 2012. Retrieved July 19, 2014. 
  26. ^ Lieberthal, Kenneth; Jisi, Wang (March 30, 2012). "Addressing U.S.-China Strategic Distrust" (PDF). China Center at Brookings. Retrieved July 19, 2014. 
  27. ^ a b Beardson, Timothy (June 28, 2013). "I don't see China becoming a superpower in this century". The Times Of India. 
  28. ^ Beardson, Timothy (May 24, 2013). "Action Needed on the Environment". Huffington Post. Retrieved July 26, 2014. 
  29. ^ Rein, Shaun (December 15, 2009). "Yes, China Has Fully Arrived As A Superpower". Forbes. Retrieved July 26, 2014. 
  30. ^ Fallows, James (April 2, 2008). "More on poverty and superpower status". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  31. ^ Shirk, S. (2008). China: Fragile Superpower. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537319-6. 
  32. ^ Pei, Minxin (January 20, 2010). "China's Not a Superpower". The Diplomat. Retrieved February 10, 2012. 
  33. ^ Pei, Minxin (March 20, 2012). "The Loneliest Superpower". Foreign Policy. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  34. ^ a b Chua, Amy (2007). Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fall. Random House. ISBN 978-0-385-51284-8. 
  35. ^ "The EU Future: Global Power or European Governance". Wilson Center. Retrieved July 28, 2014. 
  36. ^ Reid, T. R. (2004) The United States of Europe 305p, Penguin Books ISBN 1-59420-033-5
  37. ^ a b Reding, Andrew (January 6, 2002). "EU in position to be world's next superpower". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  38. ^ Moravcsik, Andrew. "The Quiet Superpower" (PDF). Princeton University Press. Retrieved July 26, 2014. 
  39. ^ Leonard, Mark. Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century. Perseus Books Group. ISBN 1-58648-424-9. 
  40. ^ Rifkin, Jeremy (2004). The European Dream. ISBN 1-58542-345-9. 
  41. ^ Clarke, Richard A. (2006). "The European Superpower". Palgrave Macmillan. 
  42. ^ D.C. Dispatch (February 1, 2005). "Europe Is the Next Rival Superpower. But Then, So Was Japan.". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 28, 2008. Retrieved July 26, 2014. 
  43. ^ Brogan, Benedict (October 7, 2000). "Blair wants EU to become superpower". The Daily Telegraph (London). Retrieved March 27, 2014. 
  44. ^ "Europe: the new superpower". CER. February 18, 2005. Retrieved May 28, 2014. 
  45. ^ a b McCormick, John (November 14, 2006). The European Superpower. ISBN 978-1-4039-9846-0. 
  46. ^ Khanna, Parag. "The Empire Strikes Back". ParagKhanna.com. Retrieved March 14, 2014. 
  47. ^ Parag Khanna. "US scholar Parag Khanna on the rise of the new Rome - Europe | World news". The Guardian. Retrieved March 14, 2014. 
  48. ^ Khanna, Parag. "The Empire Strikes Back". Parag Khanna. Retrieved August 2, 2014. 
  49. ^ "Languages of the world". Nocturne. Archived from the original on March 2, 2010. Retrieved July 26, 2014. 
  50. ^ "’EU will be Super Power with Turkey’". Turkish Weekly. June 4, 2005. Retrieved February 10, 2012. 
  51. ^ Europe in the New Century: Visions of an Emerging Superpower. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  52. ^ "Danish Envoy: Economic Strength Makes EU a 'Rising Superpower". Globalatlanta. Retrieved July 19, 2014. 
  53. ^ Hyde-Price, Adrian (October 23, 2004). "The EU, Power and Coercion: From 'Civilian' to 'Civilising' Power" (PDF). ARENA Centre for European Studies. Archived from the original on March 26, 2009. 
  54. ^ "Europe vs. America by Tony Judt | The New York Review of Books". Nybooks.com. Retrieved February 10, 2012. 
  55. ^ "Will the EU Ever Become a Superpower?" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment. July 17, 2008. Retrieved February 10, 2012. 
  56. ^ "(FCO) Europe 2030: Model power not Superpower - Bruges Speech by the Rt Hon David Miliband MP Foreign Secretary" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  57. ^ Asa, Amotz. "Middle Israel: Barack Obama and the decline of America | Columnists | Jerusalem Post". Fr.jpost.com. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  58. ^ Stahl, Julie (January 2, 2004). "Europe Wants to Rival US as Military Superpower, Says EU Parliamentarian". Crosswalk.com. Retrieved February 10, 2012. 
  59. ^ "EU Constitution: A 'Superpower Europe' It Won't Be". Globalpolicy.org. 2003-07-18. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  60. ^ "So Europe wants to be a superpower". isn.ethz.ch. November 5, 2007. Retrieved July 19, 2014. 
  61. ^ "Howard warning on EU 'superpower'". BBC News. November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 22, 2010. 
  62. ^ "The European Union, a "Quiet Superpower" or a Relic of the Past | USC Center on Public Diplomacy". Uscpublicdiplomacy.org. March 25, 2007. Retrieved May 28, 2014. 
  63. ^ "UK | UK Politics | Miliband EU speech in full". BBC News. November 15, 2007. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  64. ^ Kern, Soeren (November 20, 2013). "Articles: Why Europe Won't Be Running the 21st Century". Americanthinker.com. Retrieved March 17, 2014. 
  65. ^ Kirkup, James (January 14, 2014). "George Osborne lectures the EU on reform". London: Telegraph. Retrieved March 17, 2014. 
  66. ^ "EU falling behind India, China: British finance minister". The Times of India. January 15, 2014. Retrieved March 17, 2014. 
  67. ^ Osborn, Andrew (January 16, 2014). "Reform or lose us as member, Britain's finance minister tells EU". Reuters. Retrieved March 17, 2014. 
  68. ^ a b Zakaria, Fareed (March 5, 2006). "India Rising". Newsweek. Retrieved August 2, 2014. 
  69. ^ Giridharadas, Anand (July 21, 2005). "India welcomed as new sort of superpower". Highbeam. Retrieved August 2, 2014. 
  70. ^ Ambrose, Jeffrey R. "India: A Superpower in the Making?". RealTruth.org. Retrieved August 2, 2014. 
  71. ^ "India 2025: What kind of superpower?". Economictimes.indiatimes.com. 2011-01-09. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  72. ^ Meredith, R (2008) The Elephant and the Dragon: The Rise of India and China and What it Means for All of Us, p.6, "W.W Norton and Company" ISBN 978-0-393-33193-6
  73. ^ Zakaria, F (2008) The Post-American World, "W. W. Norton and Company" ISBN 978-0-393-06235-9
  74. ^ "'India will be the biggest superpower'". Rediff. 2006. Retrieved 19 July 2014. 
  75. ^ Khanna, Parag (2008-01-27). "Waving Goodbye to Hegemony". The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  76. ^ Khanna, Parag (2009). The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. Random House. ISBN 978-0-812-97984-8. 
  77. ^ Khanna, Parag (2008-05-18). "The Rise of Non-Americanism". Newamerica.net. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  78. ^ "Parag Khanna". Parag Khanna. 2010-12-28. Retrieved 2012-02-10. 
  79. ^ a b Pritchett, L. (2009). "A Review of Edward Luce'sIn Spite of the Gods: The Strange Rise of Modern India". Journal of Economic Literature 47 (3): 771–081. doi:10.1257/jel.47.3.771.  edit
  80. ^ a b c d e Miller, Manjari Chatterjee (May–June 2013). "India's Feeble Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs 92 (3): p.14. Retrieved 27 June 2013. 
  81. ^ Miller, Manjari Chatterjee (May–June 2013). "India's Feeble Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs 92 (3): p.15. Retrieved 27 June 2013. 
  82. ^ Miller, Manjari Chatterjee (May–June 2013). "India's Feeble Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs 92 (3): p.17. Retrieved 27 June 2013. 
  83. ^ Miller, Manjari Chatterjee (May–June 2013). "India's Feeble Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs 92 (3): p.18. Retrieved 27 June 2013. 
  84. ^ a b Collecott, Peter. "Brazil’s Quest for Superpower Status". The Diplomatic Courier. Retrieved 10 August 2014. 
  85. ^ a b c d e f Ho Chun, Kwang (28 January 2014). The BRICs Superpower Challenge: Foreign and Security Policy Analysis. United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 1409468712. 
  86. ^ Stack, Megan K. (September 11, 2009). "Venezuela's Hugo Chavez recognizes independence of breakaway Georgia republics". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  87. ^ Berger, Robert (February 13, 2010). "Netanyahu Heads to Russia with Call for 'Crippling Sanctions' on Iran". Voice of America. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  88. ^ Rosefielde, Steven (February 2005). Russia in the 21st Century. UNC Press. ISBN 978-0-521-54529-7. 
  89. ^ Kinzer, Stephen (May 11, 2014). "Russia acts like any other superpower". Boston Globe. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  90. ^ Fleischer, Matthew (March 12, 2014). "How curbing climate change can prevent Russia from becoming a superpower". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  91. ^ "Russia is a force for moral good but no superpower". Reuters. December 12, 2013. Retrieved August 2, 2014. 
  92. ^ Путин: Россия не претендует на статус сверхдержавы. vedomosti.ru (in Russian). Vedomosti. December 12, 2013. Retrieved July 8, 2014. 
  93. ^ Adelman, Jonathan (November 24, 2013). "Why The U.S. Remains The World's Unchallenged Superpower". Forbes. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 
  94. ^ "Despite huge cash bonuses to mothers, Russia's population is shrinking". GlobalPost. 2011-11-03. Retrieved 2014-07-08. 
  95. ^ The Wall Street Journal: Do the Math: Why Russia Won't Be a Superpower Anytime Soon, Peter Brown, August 26, 2009
  96. ^ "In Decline, Putin's Russia Is On Its Way to Global Irrelevance". Newsweek. December 12, 2011. Retrieved August 2, 2014. 
  97. ^ "Russia's Population Isn't Shrinking (It's Growing Very, Very Slowly)". Forbes. Retrieved July 8, 2014. 
  98. ^ Smith, Nathan. "Do not treat Russia like a superpower, it isn't". National Business Review. Retrieved July 7, 2014. 

External links[edit]

Do you want to build a website?
Start Here

Our Guidelines:

  • Reliability
  • Professionalism
  • Innovation